Influence of novel CYP2C-haplotype on proton pump inhibitor pharmacokinetics in children.

In this brief report, we provide an analysis of the influence of a novel CYP2C haplotype (CYP2C:TG) on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) pharmacokinetics (PK) in children. The CYP2C:TG haplotype has been proposed to be associated with increased CYP2C19 activity. We sought to determine if this CYP2C:TG haplotype resulted in similar alterations in metabolism for proton pump inhibitors, which are primarily metabolized by CYP2C19. In a cohort of 41 children aged 6-21 participating in a PPI pharmacokinetic study, effects of the CYP2C:TG allele were assessed by fitting two linear regression models for each of the six PK outcomes assessed, the second of which accounted for the presence of the CYP2C:TG allele. The difference in R2 values between the two models was computed to quantify the variability in the outcome that could be accounted for by the CYP2C:TG allele after adjustment for the CYP2C19 genotype. We found the CYP2C:TG haplotype to have no measurable additive impact on CYP2C19-mediated metabolism of PPIs in vivo in older children and adolescents. The findings of this study do not support the clinical utility of routine testing for the CYP2C:TG haplotype to guide PPI dose adjustments in children.

A comprehensive review on potential drug-drug interactions of proton pump inhibitors with antidiabetic drugs metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors.

A drug interaction is a condition in which two or more drugs are taken at the same time. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a significant contributor to polypharmacy. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in combination with metformin or DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin) or a combined dose of metformin and DPP-4 inhibitor to treat gastritis in diabetic patients. This review article mainly focused on evaluating the potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between PPIs (i.e. esomeprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) with metformin and PPIs with DPP-4 inhibitors. The findings demonstrated the existence of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic DDIs between the aforementioned PPIs with metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors, which could impact the biological activities (i.e., hypoglycemia) of these drugs. Moreover, this review suggested that esomeprazole could be the best drug in the PPI group to be prescribed simultaneously with metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors, as most of the antidiabetic drugs of this study did not show any interaction with esomeprazole. The findings of this study also revealed that both antidiabetic drugs and PPIs could have positive interactions as PPIs have the potential to lessen the gastrointestinal side effects of metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors. To achieve the greatest therapeutic impact with the fewest side effects, careful dose control of these drugs is required. So, more extensive research on both human and animal subjects are needed to ascertain the veracity of this hypothesis.

Effect of Food and a Proton-Pump Inhibitor on the Absorption of Encorafenib: An In Vivo-In Vitro-In Silico Approach.

Encorafenib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF mutant melanoma and BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. To understand the effect of food and coadministration with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), in vitro, in vivo, and in silico data were generated to optimize the clinical dose, evaluate safety, and better understand the oral absorption process under these conditions. Study 1 evaluated the effect of food on the plasma pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after a single oral dose of encorafenib 100 mg. Study 2 evaluated the same end points with coadministration of encorafenib and rabeprazole (PPI perpetrator). The in vitro gastrointestinal TIM-1 model was used to investigate the release of encorafenib and the amount available for absorption under different testing conditions (fasted, fed, and with the use of a PPI). The fasted, fed, and PPI states were predicted for the encorafenib commercial capsule in GastroPlus 9.8. In study 1, both AUCinf and AUClast decreased by 4% with the administration of a high-fat meal. The Cmax was 36% lower than with fasted conditions. All 3 exposure parameters in study 2 (AUCinf, AUClast, and Cmax) had mean changes of <10% when encorafenib was coadministered with a PPI. Using the in vitro gastrointestinal simulator TIM-1, the model demonstrated a similar release of drug, as the bioaccessible fraction, in the 3 conditions was equal (≥80%), predicting no PPI or food effect for this drug formulation. The modeling in GastroPlus 9.8 demonstrated complete absorption of encorafenib when formulated as an amorphous solid dispersion. To obtain these results, it was crucial to integrate the amorphous solubility of the drug that shows a 20-fold higher solubility at pH 6.8 compared with crystalline solubility. The increased amorphous solubility is likely the reason no PPI effect was observed compared with fasted state conditions. The prolongation in gastric emptying in the fed state resulted in delayed plasma Tmax for encorafenib. No dose adjustment is necessary when encorafenib is administered in the fed state or when coadministered with a PPI. Both the TIM-1 and physiologically based pharmacokinetic model results were consistent with the observed clinical data, suggesting that these will be valuable tools for future work.

Pharmacokinetic Interaction of Anaprazole, Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin after Single-Dose Simultaneous Administration and the Effect of Adding Bismuth on Their Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Male Chinese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori-positive ulcers are treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) + two antibiotics with/without bismuth. The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction of the novel PPI anaprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin with/without bismuth. METHODS: This single-centre, randomised, open-label phase 1 pharmacokinetic study included healthy Chinese male participants, comprising two cohorts (cohort 1, 4 × 4 crossover design; cohort 2, 2 × 2 crossover design). In cohort 1, 24 participants received four treatment cycles with a different treatment in each cycle; the washout period between cycles was 9 days. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the following four treatment sequences (1:1:1:1): anaprazole sodium enteric-coated tablet 20 mg monotherapy, amoxicillin 1000 mg monotherapy, clarithromycin 500 mg monotherapy, and a three-drug combination (anaprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg). During each treatment cycle, study drugs were administered twice daily for four consecutive days and once in the morning on the fifth day. Cohort 2 participants were administered a single dose of the three-drug combination and a single dose of a four-drug combination (three-drug combination + bismuth 0.6 g) with a washout period of 11 ± 2 days between treatments. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 32 enrolled participants (cohort 1, n = 24; cohort 2, n = 8) completed the study. There were no significant differences in exposure or time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) between each single drug or the three-drug combination (cohort 1) or between the three- and four-drug combinations (cohort 1) for any of the drugs/metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Dose adjustments for individual drugs are not necessary with combined dosing of anaprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and bismuth.

Bioequivalence and Relative Bioavailability Studies to Assess a New Acalabrutinib Formulation That Enables Coadministration With Proton-Pump Inhibitors.

Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved to treat adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, small lymphocytic lymphoma, or previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. As the bioavailability of the acalabrutinib capsule (AC) depends on gastric pH for solubility and is impaired by acid-suppressing therapies, coadministration with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) is not recommended. Three studies in healthy subjects (N = 30, N = 66, N = 20) evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), safety, and tolerability of acalabrutinib maleate tablet (AT) formulated with pH-independent release. Subjects were administered AT or AC (orally, fasted state), AT in a fed state, or AT in the presence of a PPI, and AT or AC via nasogastric (NG) route. Acalabrutinib exposures (geometric mean [% coefficient of variation, CV]) were comparable for AT versus AC (AUCinf 567.8 ng h/mL [36.9] vs 572.2 ng h/mL [38.2], Cmax 537.2 ng/mL [42.6] vs 535.7 ng/mL [58.4], respectively); similar results were observed for acalabrutinib's active metabolite (ACP-5862) and for AT-NG versus AC-NG. The geometric mean Cmax for acalabrutinib was lower when AT was administered in the fed versus the fasted state (Cmax 255.6 ng/mL [%CV, 46.5] vs 504.9 ng/mL [49.9]); AUCs were similar. For AT + PPI, geometric mean Cmax was lower (371.9 ng/mL [%CV, 81.4] vs 504.9 ng/mL [49.9]) and AUCinf was higher (AUCinf 694.1 ng h/mL [39.7] vs 559.5 ng h/mL [34.6]) than AT alone. AT and AC were similar in BTK occupancy. Most adverse events were mild with no new safety concerns. Acalabrutinib formulations were comparable and AT could be coadministered with PPIs, food, or via NG tube without affecting the PKs or PDs.

An update on drug-drug interactions associated with proton pump inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) block the gastric H/K-ATPase, therefore inhibiting acid gastric secretion, leading to an increased pH (>4). They account for an extremely high number of prescriptions worldwide. Numerous drug-drug interactions have been described with PPIs, but all the described interactions do not have clinical significance. AREAS COVERED: This review will discuss the latest updates on drug-drug interactions with PPIs, focusing on the last 10-year publications in the following areas: anti-infective agents, anticancer drugs, antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, and antidiabetics. EXPERT OPINION: Although pharmacokinetic interactions of PPIs have been described with many drugs, their clinical relevance remains controversial. However, given the extremely high number of people being treated with PPIs, clinicians should remain vigilant for interactions that may be clinically significant and require dose adjustment or therapeutic monitoring. Interestingly, not all PPIs have the same pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, with some having a strong potential to inhibit CYP2C19, such as omeprazole, esomeprazole, and lansoprazole, while others, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, and dexlansoprazole, are weak CYP2C19 inhibitors. These may be preferred depending on co-prescribed treatments.In addition, new formulations have been developed to prevent some of the gastric pH-dependent drug interactions and should be evaluated in further large-scale prospective comparative studies.

Bioavailability of acalabrutinib suspension delivered via nasogastric tube in the presence or absence of a proton pump inhibitor in healthy subjects.

AIMS: Acalabrutinib, a selective Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Many critically ill patients are unable to swallow and need oral medications to be delivered via a nasogastric (NG) tube. Furthermore, critically ill patients are typically administered proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to prevent stress ulcers. Concomitant administration with PPIs reduces acalabrutinib exposure and is not currently recommended. To evaluate acalabrutinib in subjects co-administered with PPIs who require NG delivery, a phase 1, open-label, randomized, crossover, single-dose study was conducted in healthy subjects. METHODS: The study assessed the relative bioavailability of an acalabrutinib suspension-in regular, degassed Coca-Cola-administered via NG tube (Acala-NG) versus the pharmacokinetics (PK) of an acalabrutinib capsule administered orally with water. In addition, the PPI effect was evaluated by comparing the PK following Acala-NG in the presence or absence of rabeprazole. RESULTS: Exposure of acalabrutinib and its active metabolite (ACP-5862) were comparable following administration of Acala-NG versus the oral capsule (Geo mean ratio, % ref [90% confidence interval, CI]: acalabrutinib AUCinf : 103 [93-113]; Cmax : 144 [120-173]). In addition, exposure was similar following administration of Acala-NG with and without a PPI (Geo mean ratio, % ref [90% CI]: acalabrutinib AUCinf : 105 [79-138]; Cmax : 95 [66-137]). No safety or tolerability concerns were observed, and all adverse events were mild and resolved without treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Acala-NG with or without a PPI is safe and well-tolerated without impeding bioavailability.

Controlled release floating drug delivery system for proton pump inhibitors lansoprazole: In-vitro, In-vivo floating and pharmacokinetic evaluation.

Lansoprazole (LPZ) show poor bioavailability because of first pass effect and absorption factors. The floating delivery systems could reduce fluctuations in plasma drug concentration through maintaining desirable plasma drug concentration. The objective of present study was to enhance bioavailability despite first pass effect through continuous availability of drug from floating system. Gum tragacanth (GT) and itaconic acid (IA) based floating hydrogels (FH) were synthesized. Parameters optimized were; microwave radiation exposure time, pH, GT:IA ratio and concentration of the glutaraldehyde. Optimized FH were evaluated for entrapment efficiency (% EE), in-vitro release, FTIR, SEM, and in- vitro and in-vivo floating study. Finally, pharmacokinetic was evaluated in ulcer-induced SD rats. Grafting percentage, swelling ratio and %EE of LPZ was 115%, Ì´250% and 90%, respectively. Microwave radiation exposure time, pH of reaction medium, GT:IA ratios and cross linker concentration were 2 min, pH 5, ratios 2:1 and 0.02%, respectively. The optimized FH showed acceptable floating behavior. The X-ray images revealed that hydrogels remained floated over gastric contents up to 24 hours. The in-vitro release and pharmacokinetics revealed availability of LPZ upto to 24h in-vitro and in ulcer-induced SD rats, respectively. The present hydrogels based floating system of lansoprazole is capable to extend the gastric residence time upto 24 hours.

Utility of the 13 C-pantoprazole breath test as a CYP2C19 phenotyping probe for children.

The 13 C-pantoprazole breath test (PAN-BT) is a safe, noninvasive, in vivo CYP2C19 phenotyping probe for adults. Our objective was to evaluate PAN-BT performance in children, with a focus on discriminating individuals who, according to guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacology Implementation Consortium (CPIC), would benefit from starting dose escalation versus reduction for proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Children (n = 65, 6-17 years) genotyped for CYP2C19 variants *2, *3, *4, and *17 received a single oral dose of 13 C-pantoprazole. Plasma concentrations of pantoprazole and its metabolites, and changes in exhaled 13 CO2 (termed delta-over-baseline or DOB), were measured 10 times over 8 h using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection and spectrophotometry, respectively. Pharmacokinetic parameters of interest were generated and DOB features derived using feature engineering for the first 180 min postadministration. DOB features, age, sex, and obesity status were used to run bootstrap analysis at each timepoint (Ti ) independently. For each iteration, stratified samples were drawn based on genotype prevalence in the original cohort. A random forest was trained, and predictive performance of PAN-BT was evaluated. Strong discriminating ability for CYP2C19 intermediate versus normal/rapid metabolizer phenotype was noted at DOBT30 min (mean sensitivity: 0.522, specificity: 0.784), with consistent model outperformance over a random or a stratified classifier approach at each timepoint (p < 0.001). With additional refinement and investigation, the test could become a useful and convenient dosing tool in clinic to help identify children who would benefit most from PPI dose escalation versus dose reduction, in accordance with CPIC guidelines.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Study of Omecamtiv Mecarbil With Omeprazole, a Proton Pump Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects.

Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is a novel cardiac myosin activator in development for the treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. OM is administered as a 25-, 37.5-, or 50-mg modified-release formulation in patients with HF. Proton pump inhibitors are one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in this patient population. Given the potential for coadministration of both drugs in patients with HF, we evaluated the potential for omeprazole to affect the pharmacokinetics of OM in an open-label study in 14 healthy subjects. Subjects received a single 50-mg dose of OM on day 1, followed by 40-mg once-daily doses of omeprazole on days 4 to 8. On day 9, a single 40-mg dose of omeprazole was administered first and immediately followed by 50-mg of OM. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours after dosing following administration of OM on days 1 and 9 to characterize plasma concentrations of OM. The ratios of the geometric least-square means (90% confidence intervals) of OM coadministered with omeprazole compared to OM alone were 94.5% (81.7%-109.3%), 94.3% (81.5%-109.1%), and 101.2% (95.4%-107.3%) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and maximum observed plasma concentration, respectively. Coadministration of OM with omeprazole was not associated with any clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Single doses of OM were safe and well tolerated when coadministered with omeprazole.

An analysis of the biopharmaceutical behaviour of proton pump inhibitors with different physicochemical properties.

At present, little information on the biopharmaceutical behaviour of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) describing their absorption and biodistribution in vivo has been reported because the extreme instability of PPIs in the gastrointestinal environment makes it difficult to analyze such behaviour. In this work, a modified rat in situ intestinal perfusion model was employed to investigate absorption in the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent biodistribution of several PPIs (ilaprazole, esomeprazole and rabeprazole), which have different physicochemical properties. Our data indicated that PPIs exhibited significantly enhanced absorption rates in the whole intestine, including the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, corresponding to the increase in the oil-water partition coefficient (LogP). PPIs and corresponding salt types showed no obvious differences in absorption, implying that solubility changes in the PPI have little effect on its absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. Among these PPIs, ilaprazole presented a more stable intestinal absorption behaviour, as well as more distribution and longer residence time in the stomach by HPLC-MS/MS analysis and radioactivity counts after 14C radiolabelling. These results may be useful information for PPI optimization and oral formulation design.

Effect of Elevated pH on the Commercial Enteric-Coated Omeprazole Pellets Resistance: Patent Review and Multisource Generics Comparison.

Omeprazole is a widely used over-the-counter (20 mg) proton pump inhibitor, usually supplied as oral enteric-coated pellets intended to release at pH 5.5 and higher; however, it is sensitive to acidic pH. The likelihood of elevated gastric pH in practice is very high for patients; thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of elevated pH on the performance of commercial omeprazole pellets. Commercial enteric-coated delayed-release pellets were tested with water uptake-weight loss (WU-WL) test at pH range between 1.2 and 4.5 in addition to "gastric" (pH 1.2 or 4.5) and "intestinal" (pH 7.4) phase dissolution tests. The range of physical characteristics of pellets was determined with a single pellet size and sedimentation time measurement, followed by the application of modified Stokes' Law equation. The coefficient of variation of pellet size and density, and volume-density determination coefficient (R2) as descriptors of coating thickness and microstructure variability, degree of ionisation of enteric polymers, aqueous solubility and molecular weight of plasticisers have been found useful to explain commercial delayed-release pellets behaviour during WU-WL and dissolution test. Investigated commercial delayed-release pellets demonstrated pH-dependent WU-WL results. "Gastric phase" dissolution testing of pellets at pH 4.5 showed the highest omeprazole degradation (48.1%) for Nosch Labs, intermediate values of dose loss (23.4% and 17.1%) for Teva and UQUIFA delayed-release pellets, respectively. Lab Liconsa pellets have been found as the least susceptible (3.2% of dose loss). Additionally, "gastric phase" dissolution test at pH 4.5 significantly influenced omeprazole release during the "intestinal phase". The risk of inadequate therapy associated with intake of investigated enteric-coated delayed-release pellets at elevated gastric pH has been found as minimal for Lab Liconsa and has increased from UQUIFA and Teva to Nosh Labs pellets.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Esomeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate Immediate-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Cross-Over, Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Esomeprazole delayed release tablets (ESO) are one of the most effective treatments for acid-related disorders. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of an immediate-release capsule formulation containing esomeprazole 20 mg and sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (IR-ESO) compared to those of the esomeprazole delayed release tablet 20 mg (ESO). In addition, the impact of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms on PK and PD was evaluated. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-sequence, and 2-period crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy Chinese subjects. Subjects received either IR-ESO or ESO for 5 days. After single- and multiple-dosing administration, blood samples were collected for PK analysis, and intragastric pH was assessed by 24-h pH monitoring. The CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms were analyzed by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) [GMR (95%CI)] of IR-ESO/ESO for AUCinf [single dose: 103.60% (96.58%, 111.14%), multiple doses: 101.65% (97.88%, 105.57%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The AUCinf showed an increasing trend between CYP2C19 extensive metabolizer (EM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), and poor metabolizer (PM) after single-dose and multiple-dose administration (p < 0.05). The GMR (95%CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline [single dose: 101.07% (96.56%, 105.78%), multiple doses: 101.24% (97.74%, 104.86%)] were within the range of 80.00-125.00%. The percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline was significant difference between EM, IM, and PM after single-dose IR-ESO and ESO (p < 0.05). Drugs were all well tolerated, and there were no significant differences in adverse events between IR-ESO and ESO. CONCLUSION: This study showed that IR-ESO can inhibit the secretion of gastric acid rapidly and continuously, and that the PK and PD of IR-ESO are affected by CYP2C19 genotypes. The GMR (95% CI) of IR-ESO/ESO for AUCinf and the percentage changes in 24-h integrated gastric acidity from baseline were all within the range of 80.00-125.00%. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900024935.

Identification of the New In Vivo Metabolites of Ilaprazole in Rat Plasma after Oral Administration by LC-MS: In Silico Prediction of the H+/K+-ATPase Inhibitor.

Ilaprazole is a proton pump inhibitor used to treat digestive diseases. In this study, blood samples were collected after oral administration of ilaprazole and prepared by liquid-liquid extraction. The metabolites of ilaprazole were detected by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) and LC-MSn. A total of twelve in vivo metabolites were detected in rat plasma and six new metabolites of ilaprazole, including one reductive metabolite with sulfide (M3), two hydroxylated metabolites with sulfoxide (M7 and M8), and three oxidative metabolites with sulfone (M9, M11, and M12), were identified. The possible metabolic pathways of ilaprazole and the fragmentation behaviors of its metabolites were elucidated. The result of the in silico prediction indicates that all the new metabolites showed the potential ability to inhibit H+/K+-ATPase activity.

Use of Pharmacogenomics to Guide Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Clinical Practice.

Prescribing the right medication, at the right dose, to the right patient is the goal of every physician. Pharmacogenomic information is an emerging tool that can be used to deliver precision medicine. In this review, we discuss the pharmacogenomics of available PPIs, racial differences of CYP2C19 and how PPI pharmacogenomics affects the treatment of common gastrointestinal diseases. We also provide practical guidance on when to order pharmacogenomic testing, which test to order, and how to modify treatment based on published guidelines.

Pretreatment of Blumea lacera leaves ameliorate acute ulcer and oxidative stress in ethanol-induced Long-Evan rat: A combined experimental and chemico-biological interaction.

Blumea lacera (Burm.f.) DC. is described as a valuable medicinal plant in various popular systems of medicine. The aim of the experiment reports the in vivo antiulcer activity of methanol extract of Blumea lacera (MEBLL) and in silico studies of bioactive constituents of MEBLL. In this study, fasted Long-Evans rat treated with 80 % ethanol (0.5 mL) to induce gastric ulcer, were pretreated orally with MEBLL at different doses (250 and 500 mg/kg, p.o., b.w) and omeprazole (20 mg/kg, p.o.) and distilled water were used as a reference drug and normal control respectively. In silico activity against gastric H+-K+ATPase enzyme was also studied. The findings demonstrated that the treatment with MEBLL attenuated markedly ulcer and protected the integrity of the gastric mucosa by preventing the mucosal ulceration altered biochemical parameters of gastric juice such total carbohydrate, total protein and pepsin activity. Additionally, the experimental groups significantly (p < 0.001) inhibited gastric lesions and malondealdehyde (MDA) levels and upregulated antioxidant enzymes level. Furthermore, nine compounds were documented as bioactive, displayed good binding affinities to against gastric H+-K+ATPase enzyme while these compounds illustrated inhibitory effect. From these studies, it is established MEBLL has ulcer healing property as unveiled by in vivo and in silico studies.

Population pharmacokinetic model with time-varying clearance for lorlatinib using pooled data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer and healthy participants.

Lorlatinib, a selective inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ROS oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase, is indicated for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following progression on crizotinib and at least one other ALK inhibitor, or alectinib/ceritinib as the first ALK inhibitor therapy for metastatic disease. The population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of lorlatinib was conducted by nonlinear mixed effects modeling of data from 330 patients with ALK-positive or ROS1-positive NSCLC and 95 healthy participants from six phase I studies in healthy volunteers; demographic, metabolizer phenotype, and patient prognostic factors were evaluated as covariates. Lorlatinib plasma PK was well-characterized by a two-compartment model with sequential zero-order and first-order absorption and a time-varying induction of clearance. Single dose clearance was estimated to be 9.04 L/h. Assuming that the metabolic auto-induction of lorlatinib reaches saturation in ~ 5 half-lives, clearance was estimated to approach a maximum of 14.5 L/h at steady-state after a period of ~ 7.25 days. The volume of distribution of the central compartment was estimated to be 121 L and the first-order absorption rate constant was estimated to be 3.1 h-1 . Baseline albumin and lorlatinib total daily dose were significant covariates on lorlatinib clearance. Use of proton pump inhibitors was found to be a significant covariate on the lorlatinib absorption rate constant. These factors were assessed to have no clinically meaningful impact on lorlatinib plasma exposure, and no dose adjustments are considered necessary based on the examined covariates.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Fixed-Dose Combination of Esomeprazole and Calcium Carbonate (AD-206) to the Conventional Esomeprazole.

PURPOSE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used for the treatment of acid-related disorders. Demands for enhanced stability and faster onset led to the development of AD-206, a fixed-dose combination of a PPI (esomeprazole) with an antacid salt (calcium carbonate). This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of AD-206 (Addpharma) with conventional esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted with 2 different doses of esomeprazole at 20 and 40 mg with a fixed calcium carbonate dose of 600 mg in AD-206. Forty-four subjects were included in each dose group and randomly received either AD-206 or the conventional esomeprazole for 7 consecutive days in each period. After a single- and multiple-dose, blood samples for the PK analysis were analyzed, and 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring was conducted. RESULTS: The systemic exposure of esomeprazole after a multiple-dose of AD-206 was similar to that of the conventional esomeprazole in both doses, but the time to reach the peak concentration was faster in AD-206. The percentage decrease from baseline in the integrated gastric acidity for a 24-hour interval after the dose was not significantly different between the AD-206 and the conventional esomeprazole after a single- and multiple-dose for both doses, and the time to reach pH 4 was faster for AD-206. CONCLUSION: AD-206 showed a similar systemic exposure and suppression of gastric acid secretion after a multiple-dose compared to the conventional esomeprazole.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach to Identify the Drug-Drug Interaction Mechanism of Nifedipine and a Proton Pump Inhibitor, Omeprazole.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can affect the intragastric release of other drugs from their dosage forms by elevating the gastric pH. They may also influence drug absorption and metabolism by interacting with P-glycoprotein or with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system. Nifedipine is a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class II drug with low solubility across physiologic pH and high permeability. Previous studies have demonstrated that drug-drug interaction (DDI) existed between omeprazole and nifedipine with significantly increased systemic exposure of nifedipine in subjects after pre-treatment for 7 days with omeprazole compared to the subjects without omeprazole treatment. It was shown that omeprazole not only induced an increase in intragastric pH, but also inhibited the CYP3A4 activity, while CYP3A4-mediated oxidation is the main metabolic pathway of nifedipine. The purpose of this study is to apply a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach to investigate the DDI mechanism for an immediate release formulation of nifedipine with omeprazole. METHODS: A previously published model for omeprazole was modified to integrate metabolites and to update CYP inhibition based on the most updated published in vitro data. We simulated the nifedipine pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects with or without the multiple-dose pretreatment of omeprazole (20 mg) following oral administrations of immediate-release (IR) (10 mg) nifedipine. Nifedipine solubility at different pHs was used to simulate the nifedipine pharmacokinetics for both clinical arms. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to understand the impact of gastric pH and the CYP3A4-mediated gut and liver first pass metabolism on the overall nifedipine pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: The developed PBPK model properly described the pharmacokinetics of nifedipine and predicted the inhibitory effect of multiple-dose omeprazole on CYP3A4 activity. With the incorporation of the physiologic effect of omeprazole on both gastric pH and CYP3A4 to the PBPK model, the verified PBPK model allows evaluating the impact of the increase in gastric pH and/or CYP3A4 inhibition. The simulated results show that the nifedipine metabolic inhibition by omeprazole may play an important role in the DDI between nifedipine and omeprazole for IR nifedipine formulation. CONCLUSION: The developed full PBPK model with the capability to simulate DDI by considering gastric pH change and metabolic inhibition provides a mechanistic understanding of the observed DDI of nifedipine with a PPI, omeprazole.

Influence of Cow's Milk and Esomeprazole on the Absorption of Erlotinib: A Randomized, Crossover Pharmacokinetic Study in Lung Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Erlotinib's gastrointestinal solubility and absorption are decreased by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Since erlotinib is a lipophilic drug, we hypothesized that concomitant intake with the fatty beverage milk may be a feasible way to increase erlotinib uptake. We performed a two-period, randomized, crossover study to investigate the influence of cow's milk with 3.9% fat on the exposure of erlotinib with and without the PPI esomeprazole in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effect of esomeprazole was studied in an additional intrapatient comparison. METHOD: Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 7 and 14 during 24 consecutive hours. During the 7 days prior to pharmacokinetic sampling, erlotinib was taken daily with 250 mL of either water or milk. In the PPI arm, esomeprazole (40 mg once daily 3 h prior to erlotinib) was taken for 3 days. RESULTS: Erlotinib area under the curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC24) did not significantly change when administered with milk, compared with water, in both non-PPI users (n = 14; - 3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 12 to 8%; p = 0.57) and patients who used esomeprazole (n = 15; 0%; 95% CI - 15 to 17%; p = 0.95). Esomeprazole decreased erlotinib AUC24 by 47% (n = 9; 95% CI - 57 to - 34%; p < 0.001) and Cmax by 56% (95% CI - 64 to - 46%; p < 0.001). No differences in toxicities were observed between milk and water. CONCLUSION: Milk with 3.9% fat has no effect on the exposure to erlotinib in NSCLC patients, independent of PPI use. The combination with milk is safe and well tolerated. Concomitant esomeprazole treatment strongly decreased both erlotinib AUC24 and Cmax and should be avoided if possible.